By Dr Peter Layton
Editorial Note: In the first part of a two-part article, Dr Peter Layton explores the evolution of the armed unmanned aircraft from its first use in the Second World War through to the First Gulf War.
In the Solomon Islands off Australia’s northern shores, on the 19 October 1944, a US Navy flown, Interstate Aircraft-built TDR-1 dropped a mix of ten 100lb and 500lb bombs against Japanese gun emplacements on Ballale Island. This was the first operational armed unmanned aircraft attack in history.
The twin-engined unmanned aircraft involved was just one of some fifty sent into combat in late 1944 with Special Task Air Group One. The armed unmanned aircraft took off under radio control that was then transferred to accompanying manned TBM-1C Avenger control aircraft for the long transit to the target area. The control aircraft remained some 8-12 kilometres outside of the ground defences while using a data linked real-time video picture displayed on a cockpit mounted television screen for close-in guidance. Few of the Air Group personnel involved had even seen a television set before they joined the unit. Their feats would not be replicated until early in the 21st century.
In truth, while after 1944-armed unmanned aircraft continued to attract considerable interest and at times funding, the technology available was too immature. The crucial issue was to find technological solutions that could overcome the many problems arising from not having a person in the aircraft. Finding the right blend of complex technological solutions took several decades, but this was not enough to see armed unmanned aircraft fly again in combat. There had to be a compelling operational need only they could best meet.
Curiously enough, the next armed unmanned aircraft was again operated by the US Navy. In the 1950s, the US Navy was concerned that the Soviets were building submarines faster than it could build anti-submarine warfare (ASW) destroyers. The solution was to upgrade a large number of old Second World War vessels, but these were too small to operate manned ASW helicopters from. Soviet submarines of the time could fire on ASW destroyers at longer ranges than the destroyers could fire back. A helicopter that could drop homing torpedoes was necessary to allow them to engage first. The answer was the small QH-50 Drone Anti-Submarine Helicopter controlled by the ship’s crew through a line-of-sight data link and able to deliver two MK-44 ASW homing torpedoes where and when required. There were numerous problems and many crashes, but hundreds were built and saw service throughout the 1960s.
QH-50 enthusiasts consider the more pressing operational demands arising from the worsening Vietnam War prematurely killed the unmanned helicopter off, and in this, they may be right. In the second half of the 1960s, there was a significant air war almost daily over North Vietnam. Attacking US Air Force (USAF) and US Navy strike aircraft were pitched against a continually improving Soviet-equipped integrated air defence system featuring the latest SA-2 and SA-3 Surface-to-Air Missile systems. Bomb damage assessment was a real problem; bad weather and the heavy defences made manned aircraft reconnaissance problematic.
The solution was a fast jet, unmanned aircraft and again hundreds were built, and thousands of sorties flown. These Ryan Lightning Bugs were launched from modified C-130 transport aircraft, flew pre-planned missions and were then recovered using a parachute that was caught in mid-air by a large helicopter. This was an inflexible and expensive way to do business that only fitted the oddities of the Vietnam air environment. With the war’s end in 1975, interest also faded albeit after some trials of armed unmanned aircraft carrying bombs and missiles.
The USAF’s focus shifted to the European Central front then characterised by strong air defences, long-range fighters, a harsh electromagnetic environment and extensive jamming. Launching and recovering unmanned aircraft using slow, vulnerable C-130 transports and CH-53 helicopters in such a hostile air environment looked both very unappealing and most probably operationally ineffective.
The need that drove TDR-1 development however remained. When attacking well-defended targets in a significant war, aircrew survivability was still a real concern. In the late 1970s, the aircrew losses in a new major European War looked as though they would be exceptionally heavy, but there would not be time to bring newly trained aircrews into service as in the Second World War: what should be done? Could armed unmanned aircraft meet the need? After much thought and numerous experiments, the answer adopted instead was to invest sizable funds into high performance manned aircraft equipped with stand-off precision-guided weapons that lowered the sortie numbers required to inflict the necessary damage, field a fleet of electronic warfare attack aircraft able to defeat hostile SAM systems and build secret stealth bombers, the F-117 fleet. This approach was stunningly validated in the short very successful air campaign of the 1991 Gulf War.
Unmanned aircraft lost out not because of aviator biases as some assume but because of their technological immaturity, their relative operational ineffectiveness and their prohibitive costs. Other systems were just plain better. Unmanned aircraft were left as a potential solution in search of a mission. However, the world was about to change.
Dr Peter Layton is a Visiting Fellow at the Griffith Asia Institute, Griffith University. His PhD is in grand strategy, and he has taught on this at the US National Defense University. He is the author of the book Grand Strategy.
Header Image: An Interstate TDR-1 at the National Museum of Naval Aviation, Pensacola, Florida. (Source: Wikimedia)
If you would like to contribute to From Balloons to Drones, then visit our submissions page here to find out how.
5 thoughts on “The Rise of Armed Unmanned Aircraft – Part One”
> Few of the Air Group personnel involved had even seen a television set before
> they joined the unit. Their feats would not be replicated until early in the 21st century.
This is not quite true, the Navy operationally used several television equipped F6F-5K drones to attack bridges and tunnels during the Korean war, with little success:
Good pickup. I had formed a view that the F6Fs were guided bombs similar say to the BQ-7 that were flown into targets. The TDR-1s on the other hand dropped bombs and flew on, so they could make several passes albeit they were not recoverable if being flown unmanned. A distinction only a pedant might make I know! My F6F understanding comes form: http://tailspintopics.blogspot.com/2009/11/f6f-drones.html
I didn’t mention the BQ-7 or BQ-8, as they required piloted takeoff, I guess I have my own forms of pedantry. Have you found any evidence that a TDR-1 made a multi-pass attack in combat? The only descriptions I’ve seen indicated that they were flown directly into the target. Given the poor quality of video feed and the narrow field of view, it doesn’t seem likely to me that anything other then flying into the target would be particularly effective.
Most of the descriptions I’ve seen are ‘kamikaze’ attacks and termed that. I think as these used a 2000lb bomb that it made for good photos and movies i.e. that attack on the beached Japanese mership. I have not be able to find multi-pass attack evidence (I thought I had but I can’t find it now) only single pass. The attack at the start of this post though was not a ‘kamikaze’ attack and is noted in several places albeit might be one report repeated. Depending on the target, there are advantages in dropping a stick of multiple small bombs versus impacting a single large bomb in a ‘kamikaze’ attack. I agree the NFOV issue although, with a stick accuracy becomes less critical when its an area of soft elements; gun emplacements aren’t but gun crews are. Good point you make though. Almost all guided weapons I think use unitary warheads against unitary targets. I think there were some Tomahawk versions that used cluster munitions and maybe the KEPD350; that is fly down a runway or over an aircraft parking area and dispense small bomblets of varying kinds.